The UPTR reports that the Constitutional Court has rejected the arguments of the employers’ federations demanding the annulment of the Postal Act and takes a note of this decision. Now we have to wait and see how the federal government will respond.
In its advice, the Constitutional Court is of the opinion that the measures introduced by the law are compatible with the law of the European Union and that it is not necessary to ask questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union for preliminary rules. The Court of Appeal is also of the opinion that the Postal Act is compatible with the principle of legality in criminal cases, the suspicion of innocence and the principle of personal criminal responsibility.
The UPtr regrets this advice, but nevertheless points out the reservation that the Constitutional Court has made with regard to the obligation to control subcontractors. More fundamentally, the Federation reminds that the Arizona coalition agreement stipulates that “the government will evaluate and simplify the legislation on the employment conditions of parcel deliverers in the context of a consultation procedure and with due observance of the objectives of the law, namely the administration of the rules for parcel deliverers and we will be superfluous and we will be superfluous and the supernatural will be superfluous and the superfluous proceedings will be superfluous and the superfluous proceedings and are superodral and necessary. Limit costs to an absolute minimum. ”
The three professional federations will certainly have a meeting in September with Minister Vanessa Matz (Les Engagés), who inherited the Postal Act in its powers. The battle is therefore moving from the judicial to the political stage.
